Options for Restructuring the State-Owned Monopoly Railway

Russell Pittman ()

Research in Transportation Economics, 2007, vol. 20, issue 1, pages 179-198

Abstract: Vertical separation in the freight railways sector may sacrifice significant economies of integration. Economies of density suggest that corresponding benefits may be elusive. We examine competitive alternatives to vertical separation. One option is the creation of competition among restructured vertically integrated railways, an option generally limited to relatively large countries absent willingness to create multinational railway networks. Second is the opening of the infrastructure of the integrated railway to access by train operating companies. Rarely are the benefits of separation of train from track likely to be so great as to outweigh the losses from the vertical separation itself.

Date: 2007

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B8JHM ... 9b00f2b0851304983ea0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:retrec:v:20:y:2007:i:1:p:179-198

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_2&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Research in Transportation Economics is edited by M. Dresner

More articles in Research in Transportation Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().