The New Classical Counter-Revolution: False Path or Illuminating Complement?

Brian Snowdon ()
Additional contact information
Brian Snowdon: Northumbria University

Eastern Economic Journal, 2007, vol. 33, issue 4, pages 541-562

Abstract: In this paper the author responds to Laurence Seidman’s recent article, ‘The New Classical Counter-Revolution: A False Path for Macroeconomics’. The author challenges the view that new classical macroeconomics has been a false path and provides a critique of Seidman’s arguments with respect to his interpretation of the 1970s ‘stagflation’, the relevance of new classical macroeconomics for practical policymaking, the contribution of real business cycle theory, and the new classical content of contemporary macroeconomic textbooks. The author concludes that the new classical counter-revolution has had an extremely productive influence on the current mainstream new neoclassical synthesis framework.

Date: 2007
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://college.holycross.edu/eej/Volume33/V33N4P541_562.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:33:y:2007:i:4:p:541-562

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Dr. Mary H. Lesser, Department of Economics, Iona College, New Rochelle, NY 10801-1890
http://www.iona.edu/eea/publications/subandmem.htm

Access Statistics for this article

Eastern Economic Journal is edited by Wesleyan University Joyce Jacobsen and Wesleyan University Gilbert L. Skillman

More articles in Eastern Economic Journal from Eastern Economic Association
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross ().