Why Has Critical Commentary Been Curtailed at Top Economics Journals? A Reply to Robert Whaples

Philip R.P. Coelho and James E. McClure ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Philip R. P. Coelho and James E. McClure

Econ Journal Watch, 2006, vol. 3, issue 2, pages 283-291

Keywords: Critical commentary; scientific inquiry; debate; editorial policy; prejudice; error; reliability; animosity; vanity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A10 A11 B40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/CoelhoMcClureEconomicsInPracticeMay2006.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:volone:2006283-291

Access Statistics for this article

Econ Journal Watch is edited by Daniel Klein

More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Atlas Economic Research Foundation
Series data maintained by Kevin Rollins ().