Gulphs in Mankind’s Career of Prosperity: A Critique of Adam Smith on Interest Rate Restrictions

Jeremy Bentham

Econ Journal Watch, 2008, vol. 5, issue 1, pages 66-77

Abstract: This a selection from Jeremy Bentham’s Defence of Usury (1787), a classic critique of Adam Smith’s endorsement of legal maximum rate of interest. Bentham’s main point against the restriction is that “projectors” generate positive externalities. The extract offers economic argumentation involving social embeddedness, asymmetric interpretation, imagination, error and correction, discovery, local knowledge, learning by doing, experimentation and selection, human folly and delusion, critical discussion as a means of testing commercial interpretations and selecting judgments, distinction and demonstration of genius and courage, as opposed to profits, being a motivator of commercial success, the distinction between voluntary and coercive action, and the moral and cultural merits of liberty.

Keywords: usury; interest; projectors; prodigals; Adam Smith; Jeremy Bentham Region; Disincentive; Workforce Participation; Assistance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K2 B1 B3 D2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/BenthamCommentJanuary2008.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ejw:volone:200866-77

Access Statistics for this article

Econ Journal Watch is edited by Daniel Klein

More articles in Econ Journal Watch from Atlas Economic Research Foundation
Series data maintained by Kevin Rollins ().