EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Auditors' perceptions of reasonable assurance in audit work and the effectiveness of the audit risk model

Philip Law

Asian Review of Accounting, 2008, vol. 16, issue 2, pages 160-178

Abstract: Purpose – Though assurance services framework has been defined in the Auditing Standards, the understandability of the concept of reasonable assurance are varied by different auditors. The audit risk model (ARM) that is being used on a worldwide basis to underpin the audit risk of companies, is often being criticized. The purpose of this paper is to assess auditors' perceptions of reasonable assurance in audit work and the effectiveness of the ARM. Design/methodology/approach – Three independent variables are examined: CPA certification, ranks of auditors and gender for their influence on two dependent variables: the perceptions of reasonable assurance in audit work and the effectiveness of the ARM. MANOVA analysis and follow up Discriminant Analysis are employed. Findings – Results reveal that there are significant differences between the perceptions held by auditors of different ranks regarding reasonable assurance in audit work. Partners entertain higher perceptions of reasonable assurance than staff auditors. The “gender” variable does not have an influence on the two dependent variables. Auditors with CPA certifications have higher perceptions of reasonable assurance. There are no differences in the perceptions ratings by different rank of auditors, gender and CPA certifications on the effectiveness of the ARM. The three independent variables have average high-mean ratings on the effectiveness of the ARM, confirming that the current ARM still can provide an effective assurance. Originality/value – This empirical study revokes the UK study and The Netherlands study. Immediate attention need not be focused on restructuring the ARM. Future contemplation of other important issue such as auditor independence may be considered.

Keywords: Audit reports; Auditors; Financial risk; Hong Kong; Modelling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentI ... le&contentId=1735045 (text/html)
Cannot be freely downloaded

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:arapps:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:160-178

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ara.htm

Access Statistics for this article

Asian Review of Accounting is edited by Jeffrey Faux

More articles in Asian Review of Accounting from Emerald Group Publishing
Series data maintained by Chris Harris ().

 
Page updated 2012-01-24
Handle: RePEc:eme:arapps:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:160-178