A Critical Assessment of Public Consultations on GMOs in the European Union

Marko Ahteensuu and Helena Siipi

Environmental Values, 2009, vol. 18, issue 2, pages 129-152

Abstract: The paper highlights shortcomings in the public consultation practices on the deliberate release and placing on the market of GMOs in the European Union and in one of its member countries, Finland. It is argued that current GMO consultation practices do not meet the aims and objectives on which their introduction is typically justified. Specifically, they do not serve democracy, increase consensus, enable better decisions to be made, or establish trust. We conclude that there is a clear need for the active development of the GMO consultation practices and for a further critical discussion on the ethical and socio-political foundation of public engagement.

Keywords: Public engagement and consultation; GMOs; European Commission; Finnish Board for Gene Technology; deliberative democracy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D7 D8 I18 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2009/00000018/00000002/art00003 (application/pdf)
downloads of articles require payment or registration of paid subscription

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:env:journl:ev18:ev1806

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental Values is edited by Clive Spash

More articles in Environmental Values from White Horse Press
Series data maintained by Andrew Johnson ().