Remediation and Respect: Do Remediation Technologies Alter Our Responsibility?

Benjamin Hale and W.P. Grundy

Environmental Values, 2009, vol. 18, issue 4, pages 397-415

Abstract: In this paper we examine the relation between technologies that aim to remediate pollution and moral responsibility. Contrary to the common view that successful remediation technologies will permit the wheels of industry to turn without interruption, we argue that such technologies do not exculpate polluters of responsibility. To make this case, we examine several environmental and non-environmental cases. We suggest that some strategies for understanding the moral problem of pollution, and particularly those that emphasise harms, exclude an important dimension of morality. In lieu of these strategies, we employ the concept of respect to characterise the type of attitude that underlies many of our judgments about responsibility.

Keywords: Restoration; pollution; climate change; geoengineering; carbon capture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M14 Q52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2009/00000018/00000004/art00003 (application/pdf)
downloads of articles require payment or registration of paid subscription

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:env:journl:ev18:ev1816

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental Values is edited by Clive Spash

More articles in Environmental Values from White Horse Press
Series data maintained by Andrew Johnson ().