Does development assistance reduce violence? Evidence from Afghanistan
Tiffany Chou ()
Additional contact information
Tiffany Chou: U.S. Department of the Treasury
Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 2012, vol. 7, issue 2, 5-13
Current military doctrine emphasizes the importance of development spending in reducing insurgent violence. Using data from three distinct development programs, the Afghan National Solidarity Program, USAID’s Local Governance and Community Development Program, and the U.S. military's Commander’s Emergency Response Program (CERP), combined with military records of insurgent-initiated events, this article explores whether development aid in Afghanistan is violence-reducing. I find that overall spending has no clear effect on rebel attacks. Moreover, the type of development program most effective at reducing violence in Iraq—small CERP projects—does not appear to do so in Afghanistan. Possible reasons include troop strength, conditionality of aid, effectiveness of aid in producing benign outcomes, and measurement issues.
Keywords: Development assistance; violence; Afghanistan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D74 H56 O2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Open access 12 months after original publication. Reader registration required.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epc:journl:v:7:y:2012:i:2:p:5-13
Access Statistics for this article
Economics of Peace and Security Journal is currently edited by Jurgen Brauer and J Paul Dunne
More articles in Economics of Peace and Security Journal from Economists for Peace and Security Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Thea Harvey, Managing Editor, EPSJ ().