Abstract:
Secessions, even peaceful ones, are revolutionary events. This fact is obscured in some recent work on secession by economists, who neglect damage caused to the real economy while focussing on public ?nance. A converse mistake is made by other analysts when confronted with the passions and turmoil of secession. Some hold these characteristics to be beyond modelling while others build over-general models: more appropriate tools are game theory and the analysis of discourse. Finally, polarization is a phenomenon that links secessions with other kinds of revolution. Polarization involves political competition and “mutually pro?table antagonism”, and deserves further work.
Date: 2004
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More articles in Homo Oeconomicus from Institute of SocioEconomics Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Matthew Braham (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .