Abstract:
The politically and legally complicated character of the EU Eastern Enlargement heavily in?uenced the con?ict between the legal and economic rationality behind the construction of the EMR-II. This makes the ERM-II vulnerable to currency crises and creates conditions for a widespread currency and asset substitution in the accession countries. As a result, the participation in the ERM-II imposes unnecessary costs on the whole enlargement process. The costs could be avoided if the EU adopted a more ?exible approach to the enlargement of its monetary union, allowing for an individual path of adopting the euro in each accession country depending on its economic conditions.
Date: 2004
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More articles in Homo Oeconomicus from Institute of SocioEconomics Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Matthew Braham (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .