Abstract:
This essay combines the main ideas of neo-institutionalism with those of Evolutionary Economics in order to construct a model of the process of legal evolution. The cognitive creativity of the actors on the one hand, and wealth effects caused by negative technological externalities - resulting from the use of new technologies - on the other hand, are interpreted as the decisive factors that explain legal change. The fruitfulness of this approach is shown by its application to the development of tort law in nineteenth-century Germany. There, a trial-and-error-process of legal innovations and imitations was triggered, resulting in the present-day broad diffusion of the strict liability rule in German tort law.
Date: 2004
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More articles in Homo Oeconomicus from Institute of SocioEconomics Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Matthew Braham (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .