Conventions: Some Conventional and Some Not So Conventional Wisdom
Siegfried Berninghaus (),
Werner Güth () and
Hartmut Kliemt ()
Additional contact information Siegfried Berninghaus: Department of Economics, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
Hartmut Kliemt: Department of Philosophy, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
Abstract:
Problems of social coordination can be formalized as non-cooperative games with several equilibria. We know that in such situations serious problems of equilibrium selection arise which cannot be solved by traditional game theoretical reasoning. Conventions seem to be a powerful tool to solve equilibrium selection problems in real world societies. Essentially, two questions will be addressed in this paper: (a) Which conventions will emerge in a society? (b) How can a society break away from an inferior and reach a superior convention? It turns out that “risk dominance” of a convention plays a crucial role in dealing with both questions and generally in the evolution of conventions.
Date: 2005
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
More articles in Homo Oeconomicus from Institute of SocioEconomics Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Matthew Braham (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .