Strategic Export Promotion in the Absence of Government Precommitment

Pinelopi Goldberg ()

International Economic Review, 1995, vol. 36, issue 2, pages 407-26

Abstract: Arguments in favor of a strategic trade policy are based on the assumption that the government can credibly precommit to a policy that will not be altered, even if it is suboptimal ex post. This paper examines the implications of relaxing this assumption; to this end, a three-stage game is considered that accounts for the sunk costs associated with capacity installment. It is found that--contrary to common belief--the time-consistent optimal subsidy level is positive, though generally lower than the optimal level with precommitment. This somewhat counterintuitive result is driven by the commitment value of capacity. Copyright 1995 by Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association.

Date: 1995
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-6598%2819950 ... CO%3B2-%23&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ier:iecrev:v:36:y:1995:i:2:p:407-26

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0020-6598

Access Statistics for this article

International Economic Review is edited by Kenneth I. Wolpin

More articles in International Economic Review from Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association
Address: 160 McNeil Building, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().