Abstract:
This paper suggests a relatively simple analytical framework for taxing all financial arrangements. The debt/equity distinction is determined by the contingency principle. The accruals/realisation distinction is determined separately by the volatility principle. The capital/revenue character distinction is effectively removed directly or by a character hedging regime. Hybrids, synthetics, hedging arrangements and other portfolios are tax-assessed on an aggregate, rather than a bifurcated, basis. The framework could be applied to both classical and dividend-imputation-based business tax systems.
Date: 2006
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More articles in Fiscal Studies from Institute for Fiscal Studies Address: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE Series data maintained by Emma Hyman ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .