Returns to seniority in union and nonunion jobs: A new look at the evidence

Katharine Abraham () and Henry S. Farber

Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1988, vol. 42, issue 1, pages 3-19

Abstract: In cross-sectional data, the positive association between seniority and earnings is typically much stronger for nonunion workers than for union workers, a finding that seems inconsistent with the generalization that seniority is more important in the union sector than in the nonunion sector. The authors of this paper show that standard estimates of the return to seniority are likely to be biased upward due to unmeasured worker heterogeneity, job heterogeneity, or both, and they argue that this bias is likely to be larger in the nonunion sector than in the union sector. When they correct for this problem in analyzing data on male blue-collar workers for the years 1968-80, they find a larger return to seniority in the union sector than in the nonunion sector. (Abstract courtesy JSTOR.)

Date: 1988
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Returns to Seniority in Union and Nonunion Jobs: A New Look at the Evidence (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
520 Ives Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-3901
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Labor Relations Review is edited by Tove Hammer

More articles in Industrial and Labor Relations Review from ILR Review, ILR School, Cornell University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Brian Keeling ().