Union effects on productivity: Evidence from western U.S. sawmills

Merwin W. Mitchell and Joe A. Stone ()

Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1992, vol. 46, issue 1, pages 135-145

Abstract: The authors conjecture that previous studies have tended to overestimate the productivity of union firms relative to nonunion firms due to inadequate controls for output quality and input usage-important omissions if the higher cost of unionized labor leads to less labor-intensive products and techniques. To avoid those problems, this study examines a fairly standardized commodity, lumber, and controls for detailed product attributes and inputs. An analysis of data from a survey administered by the authors shows that unionized sawmills were between 12% and 21% less productive than nonunionized mills in fiscal year 1986. As predicted, when product quality and raw material usage are not included in the analysis, the estimate of union productivity is biased upward. (Abstract courtesy JSTOR.)

Date: 1992
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
520 Ives Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-3901
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Labor Relations Review is edited by Tove Hammer

More articles in Industrial and Labor Relations Review from ILR Review, ILR School, Cornell University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Brian Keeling ().