Do injured workers pay for reasonable accommodation?

Morley Gunderson () and Douglas Hyatt

Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1996, vol. 50, issue 1, pages 92-104

Abstract: The authors present evidence on the extent to which injured workers in Ontario in 1979-88 "paid," through lower wages, for "reasonable accommodation" requirements designed to facilitate their return to work after their injury. The data source, the Ontario Workers' Compensation Board's Survey of Workers with Permanent Impairments, provides detailed information on two categories of accommodation: workplace modifications, such as customized equipment and shortened work schedules; and reductions in physical demands, such as exemption from bending and heavy lifting. Employers who rehired their own injured workers appear to have absorbed virtually all the cost of the accommodations they made, but employers who hired workers who were injured at other firms shifted a substantial portion of the cost of workplace modifications (though not the cost of reductions in physical demands) onto the injured workers, in the form of lower pay. (Abstract courtesy JSTOR.)

Date: 1996
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ilr:articl:v:50:y:1996:i:1:p:92-104

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
621 Ives Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-3901
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Labor Relations Review is edited by Tove Hammer

More articles in Industrial and Labor Relations Review from ILR Review, ILR School, Cornell University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jami Carlacio ().