How Successful Have Trade Unions Been? A Utility-Based Indicator of Union Well-Being

John Pencavel

Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2009, vol. 62, issue 2, pages 147-156

Abstract: Can conventional economic analysis help in defining and measuring the success of labor unions? In this paper, a general indicator of union welfare is proposed and particular expressions for the wage and employment objectives of unions are rearranged to derive measures of union success or welfare. These indicators combine two measures: union density and the relative union-nonunion wage gap. The indicators are applied to describe the movement of union welfare in the United States over the past eighty years, the differences in union success among groups of U.S. workers, and the variation in union well-being across countries. The results suggest that U.S. unions’ success peaked in the 1950s and 1960s; they have tended to benefit black workers, especially black men, more than other groups; and in recent decades a very low unionization rate has contributed to make them less successful, overall, than unions in other countries with similar labor markets.

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/vol62/iss2/1 (application/pdf)
At http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/, all visitors can get free full text downloads of articles published between April 2003 and 18 months prior to today's date. A subscription is required for full-text downloads of more recent articles. Researchers can find older issues of the Review at http://www.jstore.org.

Related works:
Working Paper: How Successful Have Trade Unions Been? A Utility-Based Indicator of Union Well-Being (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ilr:articl:v:62:y:2009:i:2:p:147-156

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
621 Ives Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-3901
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Labor Relations Review is edited by Tove Hammer

More articles in Industrial and Labor Relations Review from ILR Review, ILR School, Cornell University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jami Carlacio ().