Abstract:
In this paper, we attempt to value health risks by combining traditional demand impact analysis with direct elicitation of individuals' risk perceptions of food safety. We examine the impact of multiple risks of related goods on consumption of a risky good. We argue that the consumption of a risky good depends on both its absolute risk level and its relative risks to other risky goods. Seafood consumption in eastern North Carolina is studied. We elicit, in a survey, individual perceived risks as reference points to derive the economic value of reducing health risk in seafood consumption. Revealed and stated data are combined to trace out demand changes in response to absolute and relative risk reductions. Our results show that seafood consumption is affected by the perceived absolute risk and by the relative risk to poultry and that individuals react to the multiple risks in a nonlinear way--as suggested by our analytical model.
Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics is edited by Jeffrey M. Gillespie
More articles in Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics from Southern Agricultural Economics Association Address: Secretary/Treasurer, Dept. of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station, Griffin, Georgia 30223 Series data maintained by Chung L. Huang ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .