The case against JIVE

James MacKinnon () and Russell Davidson

Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2006, vol. 21, issue 6, pages 827-833

Abstract: We perform an extensive series of Monte Carlo experiments to compare the performance of two variants of the 'jackknife instrumental variables estimator', or JIVE, with that of the more familiar 2SLS and LIML estimators. We find no evidence to suggest that JIVE should ever be used. It is always more dispersed than 2SLS, often very much so, and it is almost always inferior to LIML in all respects. Interestingly, JIVE seems to perform particularly badly when the instruments are weak. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2006
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jae.873 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
http://qed.econ.queensu.ca:80/jae/2006-v21.6/ Supporting data files and programs (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Case Against JIVE (2004)
Working Paper: THE CASE AGAINST JIVE (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jae:japmet:v:21:y:2006:i:6:p:827-833

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www3.intersci ... e.jsp?issn=0883-7252

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Econometrics is edited by M. Hashem Pesaran

More articles in Journal of Applied Econometrics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().