The availability heuristic in the classroom: How soliciting more criticism can boost your course ratings

Craig R. Fox

Judgment and Decision Making, 2006, vol. 1, pages 86-90

Abstract: This paper extends previous research showing that experienced difficulty of recall can influence evaluative judgments (e.g., Winkielman \& Schwarz, 2001) to a field study of university students rating a course. Students completed a mid-course evaluation form in which they were asked to list either 2 ways in which the course could be improved (a relatively easy task) or 10 ways in which the course could be improved (a relatively difficult task). Respondents who had been asked for 10 critical comments subsequently rated the course more favorably than respondents who had been asked for 2 critical comments. An internal analysis suggests that the number of critiques solicited provides a frame against which accessibility of instances is evaluated. The paper concludes with a discussion of implications of the present results and possible directions

Keywords: availability; course evaluations; accessibility; easy of retrieval (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06020.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/06020/jdm06020.htm (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:1:y:2006:i::p:86-90

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().