New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis

Felix Acker

Judgment and Decision Making, 2008, vol. 3, pages 292-303

Abstract: Ninety-eight Australian students participated in a functional replication of a study published by Dijksterhuis et al.\ (2006). The results indicated that unconscious thought does not necessarily lead to better normative decision making performance than conscious thought, which is contrary to the results found in Dijksterhuis et al. Since other studies showed a positive, though statistically not significant, effect for unconscious thought, a meta-analysis comprising a total of 17 experiments was conducted. It suggests that there is little evidence for an advantage to normative decision making using unconscious thought. However, a discussion of potential moderators shows that further study would help to identify situations in which unconscious thought is truly helpful and those in which it is not.

Keywords: unconscious thought; meta-analysis; normative decision making. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71128.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/71128/jdm71128.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:292-303

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().