Moral distance in dictator games

Fernando Aguiar, Pablo Brañas-Garza () and Luis M. Miller ()

Judgment and Decision Making, 2008, vol. 3, pages 344-354

Abstract: We perform an experimental investigation using a dictator game in which individuals must make a moral decision --- to give or not to give an amount of money to poor people in the Third World. A questionnaire in which the subjects are asked about the reasons for their decision shows that, at least in this case, moral motivations carry a heavy weight in the decision:\ the majority of dictators give the money for reasons of a consequentialist nature. Based on the results presented here and of other analogous experiments, we conclude that dicator behavior can be understood in terms of moral distance rather than social distance and that it systematically deviates from the egoism assumption in economic models and game theory. %\textit{JEL}: A13, C72, C91

Keywords: dictator game; moral distance; moral motivations; experimental economics. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71218.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/71218/jdm71218.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:344-354

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().