Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention

K. Carrie Armel, Aurelie Beaumel and Antonio Rangel

Judgment and Decision Making, 2008, vol. 3, pages 396-403

Abstract: Several decision-making models predict that it should be possible to affect real binary choices by manipulating the relative amount of visual attention that decision-makers pay to the two alternatives. We present the results of three behavioral experiments testing this prediction. Visual attention is controlled by manipulating the amount of time subjects fixate on the two items. The manipulation has a differential impact on appetitive and aversive items. Appetitive items are 6 to 11\% more likely to be chosen in the long fixation condition. In contrast, aversive items are 7\% less likely to be chosen in the long fixation condition. The effect is present for primary goods, such as foods, and for higher-order durable goods, such as posters.

Keywords: construction of preferences; visual attention; race-to-barrier models; neuroeconomics. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/8319/jdm8319.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/8319/jdm8319.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:396-403

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().