Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation

Edward T. Cokely and Colleen M. Kelley

Judgment and Decision Making, 2009, vol. 4, issue 1, pages 20-33

Abstract: Individual differences in cognitive abilities and skills can predict normatively superior and logically consistent judgments and decisions. The current experiment investigates the processes that mediate individual differences in risky choices. We assessed working memory span, numeracy, and cognitive impulsivity and conducted a protocol analysis to trace variations in conscious deliberative processes. People higher in cognitive abilities made more choices consistent with expected values; however, expected-value choices rarely resulted from expected-value calculations. Instead, the cognitive ability and choice relationship was mediated by the number of simple considerations made during decision making --- e.g., transforming probabilities and considering the relative size of gains. Results imply that, even in simple lotteries, superior risky decisions associated with cognitive abilities and controlled cognition can reflect metacognitive dynamics and elaborative heuristic search processes, rather than normative calculations. Modes of cognitive control (e.g., dual process dynamics) and implications for process models of risky decision-making (e.g., priority heuristic) are discussed.

Keywords: Risky choice; intelligence; working memory; numeracy; cognitive control; dual process theory; information search; rationality; expected value; protocol analysis; priority heuristic. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/81125/jdm81125.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/81125/jdm81125.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:20-33

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().