Speakers' choice of frame in binary choice: Effects of recommendation mode and option attractiveness

Marc van Buiten and Gideon Keren

Judgment and Decision Making, 2009, vol. 4, issue 1, pages 51-63

Abstract: A distinction is proposed between \textit{recommending for} preferred choice options and \textit{recommending against} non-preferred choice options. In binary choice, both recommendation modes are logically, though not psychologically, equivalent. We report empirical evidence showing that speakers recommending for preferred options predominantly select positive frames, which are less common when speakers recommend against non-preferred options. In addition, option attractiveness is shown to affect speakers' choice of frame, and adoption of recommendation mode. The results are interpreted in terms of three compatibility effects, (i) \textit{recommendation mode---valence framing compatibility}: speakers' preference for positive framing is enhanced under \textit{recommending for} and diminished under \textit{recommending against} instructions, (ii) \textit{option attractiveness---valence framing compatibility}: speakers' preference for positive framing is more pronounced for attractive than for unattractive options, and (iii) \textit{recommendation mode---option attractiveness compatibility}: speakers are more likely to adopt a \textit{recommending for} approach for attractive than for unattractive binary choice pairs.

Keywords: framing; positivity bias; recommendation mode; valence. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/8819/jdm8819.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/8819/jdm8819.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:51-63

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().