The coexistence of overestimation and underweighting of rare events and the contingent recency effect

Greg Barron and Eldad Yechiam

Judgment and Decision Making, 2009, vol. 4, issue 6, pages 447-460

Abstract: Previous research demonstrates overestimation of rare events in judgment tasks, and underweighting of rare events in decisions from experience. The current paper presents three laboratory experiments and a field study that explore this pattern. The results suggest that the overestimation and underweighting pattern can emerge in parallel. Part of the difference between the two tendencies can be explained as a product of a contingent recency effect: Although the estimations reflect negative recency, choice behavior reflects positive recency. A similar pattern is observed in the field study: Immediately following an aversive rare-event (i.e., a suicide bombing) people believe the risk decreases (negative recency) but at the same time exhibit more cautious behavior (positive recency). The rest of the difference is consistent with two well established mechanisms: judgment error and the use of small samples in choice. Implications for the two-stage choice model are discussed.

Keywords: decision making; rare events; judgment; choice; learning; terror; probability. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/9729b/jdm9729b.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/9729b/jdm9729b.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:6:p:447-460

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().