An expected utility analysis of k-majority rules
Keith L. Dougherty () and
Additional contact information
Keith L. Dougherty: University of Georgia
Robi Ragan: Mercer University
Constitutional Political Economy, 2016, vol. 27, issue 3, pages 332-353
Abstract Buchanan and Tullok (The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1962) argued that the optimal k-majority rule should minimize the sum of external costs and decision costs. Dougherty et al. (Public Choice, 163(1–2):31–52, 2015) formalized their approach using various groups of voters. In this study, we analyze the optimal k-majority rule in terms of expected utility and compare our results to Dougherty et al. (2015), which focuses on costs alone. Specifically, we replace Buchanan and Tullock’s external cost function with an external utility function that accounts for both the benefits and costs of enacting proposals. We find that analyzing k-majority rules in terms of utility, rather than costs, affects the optima. Furthermore, in terms of utility, the optimal k-majority rule can vary depending on the group one expects to be in during a vote. With some interesting exceptions, individuals from groups that favor the proposal often find small k-majority rules optimal. Individuals from groups that oppose the proposal often find large k-majority rules optimal.
Keywords: k-Majority rules; q-Rules; Constitutional design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C63 D70 D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10602-016-9217-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:copoec:v:27:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10602-016-9217-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/10602/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Constitutional Political Economy is currently edited by Roger Congleton and Stefan Voigt
More articles in Constitutional Political Economy from Springer
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla ().