Reopening the Convergence Debate: A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics

Francesco Caselli (), Gerardo Esquivel () and Fernando Lefort

Journal of Economic Growth, 1996, vol. 1, issue 3, pages 363-89

Abstract: There are two sources of inconsistency in existing cross-country empirical work on growth: correlated individual effects and endogenous explanatory variables. We estimate a variety of cross-country growth regressions using a generalized method of moments estimator that eliminates both problems. In one application, we find that per capita incomes converge to their steady-state levels at a rate of approximately 10 percent per year. This result stands in sharp contrast to the current consensus, which places the convergence rate at 2 percent. We discuss the theoretical implications of this finding. In another application, we perform a test of the Solow model. Again, contrary to prior results, we reject both the standard and the augmented version of the model. Copyright 1996 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Date: 1996
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Reopening the Convergence Debate: A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jecgro:v:1:y:1996:i:3:p:363-89

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Growth is edited by Oded Galor

More articles in Journal of Economic Growth from Springer
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().