Appeasing nihilists? Some economic thoughts on reducing terrorist activity

Jan Schnellenbach ()

Public Choice, 2006, vol. 129, issue 3, pages 301-313

Abstract: Recent contributions to the economics of terrorism have given contradicting recommendations for campaigning against terrorism, from the proposal to deprive terrorists of their resources to the proposal of raising the opportunity costs of terrorism by increasing the wealth of the affected regions. Within a simple framework which differentiates between the decision to become an active terrorist and the decision to support terrorists and which allows for reciprocal reactions to anti-terrorism policies, it is argued here that undifferentiated deterrence may indeed backfire, but so may an increase of the opportunity costs of terrorism. A very targeted anti-terrorism policy aimed only at active terrorists would then be the most reasonable remaining approach. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2006

Keywords: Terrorism; Deterrence; Reciprocity; Anti-terrorism policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11127-006-9029-9 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Appeasing Nihilists? Some Economic Thoughts on Reducing Terrorist Activity (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:129:y:2006:i:3:p:301-313

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is edited by Charles K. Rowley, WIlliam F. Shughart and Robert D. Tollison

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().