Retroactive Liability or the Public Purse?

James W. Boyd () and Howard Kunreuther

Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1997, vol. 11, issue 1, pages 79-90

Abstract: The article addresses the question of whether responsibility for pollution created in the past should be retroactively applied to firms, or if the costs of cleaning up existing pollution should be financed by the public. We show that making firms liable for retrospective environmental costs can weaken the incentive to take precautions against future environmental costs. This follows since public financing of these costs can lead to greater prospective risk deterrence by allowing firms to more fully internalize the costs of future environmental risks. However, an analysis of existing public financing approaches highlights a set of dangers associated with their practical use. Copyright 1997 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Date: 1997
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0922-680X/contents link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:11:y:1997:i:1:p:79-90

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Regulatory Economics is edited by Michael A. Crew

More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().