Better May be Worse: Some Monotonicity Results and Paradoxes in Discrete Choice Under Uncertainty

Jörgen W. Weibull, Lars-Göran Mattsson () and Mark Voorneveld

Theory and Decision, 2007, vol. 63, issue 2, pages 121-151

Abstract: It is not unusual in real-life that one has to choose among finitely many alternatives when the merit of each alternative is not perfectly known. Instead of observing the actual utilities of the alternatives at hand, one typically observes more or less precise signals that are positively correlated with these utilities. In addition, the decision-maker may, at some cost or disutility of effort, choose to increase the precision of these signals, for example by way of a careful study or the hiring of expertise. We here develop a model of such decision problems. We begin by showing that a version of the monotone likelihood-ratio property is sufficient, and also essentially necessary, for the optimality of the heuristic decision rule to always choose the alternative with the highest signal. Second, we show that it is not always advantageous to face alternatives with higher utilities, a non-monotonicity result that holds even if the decision-maker optimally chooses the signal precision. We finally establish an operational first-order condition for the optimal precision level in a canonical class of decision-problems, and we show that the optimal precision level may be discontinuous in the precision cost. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Keywords: decision theory; discrete choice; monotonicity; uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11238-007-9041-7 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:63:y:2007:i:2:p:121-151

Access Statistics for this article

Theory and Decision is edited by Bertrand R. Munier

More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().