Finding Footing in a Postmodern Conception of Law (English version)
Bryan Druzin ()
Additional contact information
Bryan Druzin: BA, LLB, LLM, PhD candidate, King's College London, Lecturer in law, Brunel University Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
Postmodern Openings, 2012, vol. 9, pages 41-56
The following jurisprudence paper examines the implications of postmodern thought upon our conception of law. In this paper I argue that, despite the absolute, all-consuming moral relativism towards which postmodernism seems to lead in its most extreme form, its acceptance in fact in no way undermines the possibility of finding solid ground for our legal principles. This paper contends that moral objectivity can be found in the individual experience of suffering generated by these very subjective concoctions. Subjective concoctions or not, they are real in that they imbue a sense of value into conditions, and may thus serve as foundational principles for law. While our value systems are stripped of all claim to objective authority, ultimately, all postmodernism does is force us to set aside our larger concepts of “justice,” and instead root our legal conceptions at this far more fundamental level of human experience.
Keywords: Postmodernism; moral relativism; law; objective standards; utilitarianism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A23 K39 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:9:y:2012:i::p:41-56
Access Statistics for this article
Postmodern Openings is currently edited by April
More articles in Postmodern Openings from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics
Series data maintained by Amariei Mirela ().