Accounting for Stock Options: Measuring the Real Cost Through Time

William R. Cron and Randall B. Hayes
Additional contact information
William R. Cron: Central Michigan University
Randall B. Hayes: Central Michigan University

American Journal of Business, 2004, vol. 19, issue 2, pages 12-21

Abstract: Accounting for stock options is a controversial issue. The FASB recognized that the Òintrinsic valueÓ method, which had been used for years, failed to adequately account for the costs involved. To rectify the problem they suggested the use of a Òfair valueÓ method. Their proposal met with strong objections from companies, which were concerned with the impact of the proposed standard on their reported profits. Consequently, the board relented and allowed the use of either method. Unfortunately, both the intrinsic value and fair value approaches have deficiencies, particularly in regard to how they measure compensation expense and gains and losses over time. This paper addresses these shortcomings by developing two alternative cost measurement approaches that apply an option-pricing model on an iterative basis over the life of the option. Both approaches represent specific ways to implement exercise-date measurement techniques for stock options. The paper argues that both approaches provide more relevant and reliable measures of an optionÕs cost than either intrinsic or fair value methods.

Keywords: Accounting; FASB; stock options (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R00 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bsu.edu/mcobwin/majb/?p=73 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in American Journal of Business from American Journal of Business (Formerly Named "Mid-American Journal of Business")
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Judy Lane ().