Dispute Resolution in the Korean and US Markets: A Comparison

Nancy J. White and Jun Lee
Additional contact information
Nancy J. White: Central Michigan University
Jun Lee: Hedrick Brothers Construction Company

American Journal of Business, 2004, vol. 19, issue 2, pages 22-30

Abstract: Human interaction gives rise to conflict. This paper addresses general characteristics of Korean and United States culture relative to conflict resolution. In general, in the United States, conflict resolution is characterized by a win-lose philosophy. Americans approach disputes with an attitude that one party is wrong, one is right and the purpose of dispute resolution is to decide who is right. Americans also believe that though the legal system is time-consuming and expensive it can (for the most part) determine right and wrong. As a general statement most Americans respect the legal system and the law, though they find the process of litigation time consuming and expensive. In general, Koreans approach disputes with an attitude that all parties are partly wrong and partly right. Disputes are to be resolved in indirect and nonconfrontational ways so that harmony is restored and the relationship between the parties returns to one of harmonious interaction. Koreans have little respect for the law and the legal system and tend to depend upon non-legal techniques to resolve disputes.

Keywords: International business; Korean and U.S. markets; law and legal system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R00 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bsu.edu/mcobwin/majb/?p=74 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in American Journal of Business from American Journal of Business (Formerly Named "Mid-American Journal of Business")
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Judy Lane ().