The Communication Effectiveness of System Models Using the UML versus Structured Techniques: A Field Experiment

Bruce C. Hungerford and Michael A. Eierman
Additional contact information
Bruce C. Hungerford: University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Michael A. Eierman: University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh

American Journal of Business, 2005, vol. 20, issue 2, pages 35-43

Abstract: The Unified Modeling Language has become an alternative to traditional modeling languages such as data flow diagrams for use in systems analysis. A modeling language is used to represent an information system so that analysts can use the model to make decisions about the design of the system and to communicate with stakeholders about the system. This study examines the comparative effectiveness of the UML and traditional modeling languages in communicating information about a system design. The study examines this on three types of individuals: individuals with no knowledge of either modeling language, individuals with no knowledge of either language that were provided training in one of the languages, and individuals that have had more extensive training in one of the languages. The study finds that there is no difference in the ability to communicate system design information between the languages for the first two types of individuals. However, the study finds that, for more extensively trained individuals, systems modeled with the UML are better able to communicate information about the data in the system while systems modeled with traditional languages are better able to communicate information about the process used by the system.

Keywords: Information systems; unified modeling language (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R00 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bsu.edu/mcobwin/majb/?p=67 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:maj:ancoec:v:20:y:2005:i:2:p:35-43

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in American Journal of Business from American Journal of Business (Formerly Named "Mid-American Journal of Business")
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Judy Lane ().