Discipline and Liquidity in the Interbank Market

Thomas B. King

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2008, vol. 40, issue 2-3, pages 295-317

Abstract: Using 20 years of panel data, I demonstrate that high-risk banks have consistently paid more than safe banks for interbank loans and have been less likely to use these loans as a source of liquidity. The economic importance of this effect was relatively small until the mid-1990s, when regulatory and institutional changes began to impose more of the costs of bank failure on uninsured creditors. Subsequently, interbank-market price discipline roughly doubled, and risk-based rationing effects increased by a factor of six. In imposing this discipline, lenders seem to care most about credit risk at borrowing institutions. Copyright (c)2008 The Ohio State University.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell ... 38-4616.2008.00114.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking is edited by Pok-Sang Lam, Deborah Lucas, Masao Ogaki and Kenneth D. West

More articles in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking from Blackwell Publishing
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().