"Third Party Contingency" Contracts in Settlement and Litigation
Roland Kirstein and
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2004, vol. 160, issue 4, pages 555-
We present a model of recent institutional developments in litigation funding across several European jurisdictions. They combine contingency fees with third party cover for cost in the event of losing the case: we call these "Third Party Contingency" (TPC) contracts. A TPC contract can make filing a suit credible and may increase settlement amounts. This does not, however, increase the likelihood of going to trial, since TPC contracts are only of mutual benefit to the plaintiff and the third party when the case settles out of court. We demonstrate that the mere availability of TPCs may generate this strategic effect.
JEL-codes: K41 C7 G22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: "Third Party Contingency" contracts in settlement and litigation (2002)
Working Paper: Third Party Contingency contracts in settlement and litigation
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(200412)160:4_555:tpccis_2.0.tx_2-q
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG, P.O.Box 2040, 72010 Tübingen, Germany
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) is currently edited by Gerd Mühlheußer and Biung-Ghi Ju
More articles in Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) from Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Series data maintained by Thomas Wolpert ().