Do Students Know How Much They Know?
Additional contact information
Alex Lebedinsky: Western Kentucky University
The Journal of Economics, 2011, vol. 37, issue 2, pages 39-53
This paper uses a data set consisting of more than 2,000 quiz scores from an introductory statistics class and compares the actual quiz scores with students’ post-test predictions of quiz scores. The main findings are as follows: (1) Predicted scores are higher, on average, than actual scores, (2) better students predict their scores more accurately, (3) self-evaluation accuracy is worse when the material is difficult, and (4) students improve their self-evaluation accuracy over time. While previous research showed only modest improvement in self-evaluation accuracy, this study demonstrates dramatic improvements in accuracy, possibly due to the fact that students in the sample were tested frequently throughout semester.
JEL-codes: A2 A22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mve:journl:v:37:y:2011:i:2:p:39-53
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of Economics is currently edited by David R. Hakes
More articles in The Journal of Economics from Missouri Valley Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Ken Brown ().