Stabilization Policy: A Reconsideration

Janet L. Yellen and George A. Akerlof

Economic Inquiry, 2006, vol. 44, issue 1, pages 1-22

Abstract: Should stabilization policy be a macroeconomic priority? Most central banks consider it a goal, but Robert Lucas has contended that policies to stabilize output, even if effective, yield negligible welfare gains. This article critiques Lucas's argument. Existing literature suggests nontrivial benefits from stabilization due to nonlinearity of the social welfare function and of the short-run Phillips curve. Our analysis and examination of the evidence from periods of prolonged high unemployment also suggest further significant gains to stabilization since the "accelerationist" hypothesis does not seem to hold in times of very low inflation. (JEL E61, E63) Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

JEL-codes: E61 E63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ei/cbj002 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: Stabilization policy: a reconsideration (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:44:y:2006:i:1:p:1-22

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Inquiry is edited by Preston McAfee

More articles in Economic Inquiry from Oxford University Press
Address: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().