Workers Should Want to Pay More for Social Security

J. R. Clark and Dwight R. Lee

Economic Inquiry, 2006, vol. 44, issue 4, pages 753-758

Abstract: One controversial aspect of the current Social Security system has been the relative distribution of its net costs and benefits between employers and workers. Using simple supply and demand analysis, we demonstrate that proponents and opponents of the current system are making arguments that support the position of their adversaries. In particular, proponents of the existing Social Security system should be arguing that workers pay all of the Social Security tax and then some with lower wages, while opponents should be arguing that employers are paying most of the tax. (JEL H55, D78) Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

JEL-codes: H55 D78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ei/cbl002 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:44:y:2006:i:4:p:753-758

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Inquiry is edited by Preston McAfee

More articles in Economic Inquiry from Oxford University Press
Address: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().