An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer*

Albert N. Link, Donald S. Siegel () and Barry Bozeman ()

Industrial and Corporate Change, 2007, vol. 16, issue 4, pages 641-655

Abstract: Formal university technology transfer mechanisms, through licensing agreements, research joint ventures, and university-based startups, have attracted considerable attention in the academic literature. Surprisingly, there has been little systematic empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal technology transfer. This paper presents empirical evidence on the determinants of three types of informal technology transfer by faculty members: transfer of commercial technology, joint publications with industry scientists, and industrial consulting. We find that male, tenured and research-grant active faculty members are more likely to engage in all three forms of informal technology transfer. Copyright 2007 , Oxford University Press.

Date: 2007

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtm020 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:641-655

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Industrial and Corporate Change is edited by David Teece, Glenn R. Carroll, Nick Von Tunzelmann, Giovanni Dosi and Franco Malerba

More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press
Address: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().