Abstract:
This paper develops a quality-ladder model of endogenous growth to study the interplay between in-house R&D and combative advertising expenditure, and its implications for economic growth, firm size, and welfare. The analysis shows that, somewhat surprisingly, higher incentives to engage in advertising, although combative, unambiguously foster innovation activity of firms. This, possibly, leads to faster growth and even higher welfare. These results rest on two features of the model which are well-supported by empirical evidence. First, if firms incur higher sunk costs for marketing, concentration and firm size rise. Second, firm size and R&D expenditure are positively related as larger firms are able to spread R&D costs over higher sales. The analysis also suggests that R&D subsidies are conducive to R&D and growth without inducing firms to raise advertising outlays. Copyright 2008 , Oxford University Press.
Oxford Economic Papers is edited by A. Banerjee and James Forder
More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Address: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .