Why Is Bank Debt Senior? A Theory of Asymmetry and Claim Priority Based on Influence Costs

Ivo Welch ()

Review of Financial Studies, 1997, vol. 10, issue 4, pages 1203-36

Abstract: This theory can explain why bank debt is universally senior, consistent with the presence of conflict lawyers) and absolute priority violations in financial distress: better organized banks would more strongly contest priority in financial distress if they were junior. Because "deterrence can reduce creditors' total expenses in a priority contest, the ex post stronger lobbyist/litigant should be senior ex ante. For equivalent reasons, the theory can advise when public debt should be senior to trade credit and/or implicit contracts, and can even suggest one rationale for the absolute priority rule (APR). This article further shows that Chapter HI creditor reimbursement procedures can lower overall costs. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (31) Track citations by RSS feed

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:10:y:1997:i:4:p:1203-36

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www4.oup.co.uk/revfin/subinfo/

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Financial Studies is edited by Maureen O'Hara

More articles in Review of Financial Studies from Society for Financial Studies
Address: Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().