Rational Beliefs and Security Design

Mark Garmaise

Review of Financial Studies, 2001, vol. 14, issue 4, pages 1183-1213

Abstract: This article studies the security-design problem of a cash-constrained firm facing investors with diverse beliefs. Investor "rational beliefs" are modeled as varying and yet rational in the sense of Kurz (1994). With two investors, optimal designs are similar under rational beliefs and rational expectations. With many investors, however, optimal securities under rational beliefs maximize investor differences of opinion, while under rational expectations optimal designs minimize disagreements. We demonstrate that the common practice of issuing multiple securities backed by a single asset is optimal under rational beliefs but not under rational expectations. Researching market beliefs can create substantial value for firms. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.

Date: 2001
View citations in EconPapers

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:14:y:2001:i:4:p:1183-1213

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www4.oup.co.uk/revfin/subinfo/

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Financial Studies is edited by Maureen O'Hara

More articles in Review of Financial Studies from Oxford University Press for Society for Financial Studies
Address: Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().