EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Average-based versus high- and low-impact indicators for the evaluation of scientific distributions

Pedro Albarrán, Ignacio Ortuño and Javier Ruiz-Castillo ()

Research Evaluation, 2011, vol. 20, issue 4, pages 325-339

Abstract: Albarrán et al (2009a) introduced a novel methodology for the evaluation of citation distributions using a pair of high- and low-impact measures defined over the set of articles with citations below or above a critical citation level. Albarrán et al (2009b) presented the first empirical applications to a situation in which the world citation distribution in 22 scientific fields is partitioned into three geographical areas: the USA, the European Union, and the rest of the world. In this paper, we find that cardinal differences between the results obtained with our high-impact index and the mean citation rate are of a large order of magnitude. When, in addition, the percentage in the top 5% of most cited articles or the percentage of uncited articles are used, there are still important quantitative differences with respect to the high- and low-impact indicators advocated in our approach. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820211X13164389670310 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Average-based versus High- and Low-Impact Indicators for the Evaluation of Scientific Distributions (2010) Downloads
Working Paper: Average-based versus high-and low-impact indicators for the evaluation of scientific distributions (2010) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:325-339

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2013-04-01
Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:325-339