The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development, and Cross-Country Empirics

David Malin Roodman ()

World Bank Economic Review, 2007, vol. 21, issue 2, pages 255-277

Abstract: The recent literature contains many stories of how foreign aid affects economic growth. Aid raises growth in countries with good policies, or with difficult economic environments, or outside the tropics, or on average but with diminishing returns. The diversity of the results suggests that many are fragile. Seven important aid-growth papers are tested for robustness, using 14 minimally arbitrary tests deriving mainly from differences among the studies themselves. This approach investigates the importance of potentially arbitrary specification choices while minimizing the arbitrariness in testing choices. All of the results appear fragile, especially to sample expansion. Copyright The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the world bank. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2007
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhm004 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development, and Cross-country Empirics (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:21:y:2007:i:2:p:255-277

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

World Bank Economic Review is edited by Jaime de Melo

More articles in World Bank Economic Review from Oxford University Press
Address: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().