EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fiscal Policy and Economic Recovery

Christina Duckworth Romer

Business Economics, 2009, vol. 44, issue 3, pages 132-135

Abstract: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is the biggest, boldest countercyclical fiscal stimulus in American history. What is its likely impact? Current econometric models indicate that a tax cut is likely to have a multiplier of about 1.0 and that spending has a multiplier of about 1.6 after about 18 months. Even the most sophisticated econometric analysis, however, suffers from “omitted variable” bias. In trying to take account of this, David Romer and I have found that the tax multiplier is more likely to be around two to three; and we suspect that the spending multiplier is correspondingly higher than the conventional estimates. Of course, every recession is different. The unique factors of this recession are analyzed to determine whether the multipliers are likely to deviate from historical averages.Business Economics (2009) 44, 132–135. doi:10.1057/be.2009.14

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/be/journal/v44/n3/pdf/be200914a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/be/journal/v44/n3/full/be200914a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:buseco:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:132-135

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK
http://www.palgrave- ... subscribe/index.html

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Business Economics from Palgrave Macmillan Journals
Series data maintained by Elizabeth Gale ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-24
Handle: RePEc:pal:buseco:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:132-135