Abstract:
Financial markets require proper regulation and supervision. Their standards, architecture and mutual relations have to keep pace both with the current understanding of the core business as well as with market developments.The program put forward by FSAP and particularly by the Solvency II project revitalized among other things again the discussion on the future of EU insurance supervision. Should it remain – as of today – largely state based,or should it go into more or less different directions – a lead supervisor or some supranational agency? The article seeks to review major elements of the current debate and to stress the need for continuity in the possible future evolution of the EU supervisory systems. The Geneva Papers (2007) 32, 393–400. doi:10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510133
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK http://www.palgrave- ... subscribe/index.html