Abstract:
This paper compares the capability of simple inflation targeting (IT) and price-level-path targeting (PLPT) rules to minimize inflation and output gap variability in a two-country, two-sector version of the Global Economy Model calibrated for Canada and the United States. We find that simple PLPT rules are slightly better than simple IT rules at macroeconomic stabilization and that the presence of terms-of-trade shocks tends to bolster the case for PLPT. Lastly, we demonstrate that the choice of monetary policy framework in the United States does not affect the relative merits of IT vs. PLPT in Canada. IMF Staff Papers (2008) 55, 326–338. doi:10.1057/imfsp.2008.2; published online 8 April 2008
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK http://www.palgrave- ... subscribe/index.html